21 February 2017 last updated at 06:41 GMT
 
LKM Blogs
Indian Cricket's Moment of Truth
Lalit K Modi

The Honourable Supreme Court of India has given the perfect New Years’ gift to all cricket fans in India. In my view, they have set a new benchmark in the way cricket and indeed sport will be governed for ages to come.

There comes a time in every era when a landmark change happens which leaves a long-lasting impact in every sector.  In terms of India as a country, we saw that change being created first in 1991 when the economy was opened up and then in 2017 when the demonetisation of currency was implemented.

When it comes to sport, this landmark judgement by the Supreme Court on 2 January 2017 will be one that will be spoken for a long time to come. Till now change was only in the air and there was no sense of fear of it actually happening.

Now with the BCCI president and secretary being knocked out in one stroke, there is a sense of fear which is good in a way. There is a sense that the changes will happen because an exemplary punishment has been meted out. For a very long time there was a tendency to take things for granted, in true Indian style. With visible obstacles being removed, the Supreme Court has made it known that the changes must be implemented.

Usually changes which create a new era always come at a slow pace. In this case, it has taken close to three years to arrive at this scenario. What started as a fight against corruption, went a long way in making corrective changes to the opaque set-up. 

Just about 10 years ago an able team set about changing the face of Indian cricket. We had experts in every field handling departments and then were held accountable for our actions. I was entrusted with setting up the IPL. Our endeavour was always to bring in professionals to supplement the work done by committed set of office-bearers. What that resulted in was a long-term impact on how the world saw the product of cricket. This would not have been possible without division of labour, great tactical and commercial acumen coupled with the work put in by able professionals.

But over the last five years there has been a consistent attempt to completely derail the process that we had created. It is the greed, the lust of power and nepotism which has brought us to this stage in Indian cricket. The stupendous work done by the past Administrators has all gone in vain. Today the founding fathers of our great organisation will be left wounded in every way possible. This was a completely self-inflicted wound especially by Mr Thakur and Mr Shirke. Mr Thakur chose to become the fall guy, maybe hoping to get praises from his mentor. I cannot believe how he let the situation come to this pass. It showed a complete lack of respect for judicial process and for all attempts to achieve transparency.

I fail to fathom how anyone can still continue to oppose reforms that can yield more benefits for the game we all love. What everyone forgets is that the game is bigger than any individual. Legends of the game like Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid, Kapil Dev and Sunil Gavaskar have all come and gone. But that has not stopped the game from growing further. The sport has grown and added more players to the roster not because of some self-serving officials. They have all come about because of several committed coaches, players and various volunteers who have given their sweat and blood to this sport. I cannot believe that this was forgotten in the melee of wanting to retain control.

That itself should be a cue to the next set of office-bearers, the word Control needs to be weeded out from the nomenclature. The administration needs to be further professionalised, with the CEO’s team being strengthened with field experts being appointed. Similarly, there can be an attempt to make IPL a truly professional blue-chip company to make it more accountable.

I am glad that there is at least a clear roadmap for us going forward. Now it is up to all of us stakeholders to pick up the thread and get the changes implemented.

 

 

Follow my thoughts on the BCCI crisis through my Twitter account @lalitkmodi

 

 

  LALIT MODI STATEMENT ON RCA ISSUE

Mr. Lalit Modi President of Rajasthan Cricket Association (RCA) has welcomed the amicable solution of the stalemate in RCA management. In a statement issued here Lalit Modi has expressed satisfaction that good sense prevailed amongst constituent members and all differences have been buried. The time that was wasted could have been put to valuable use for betterment of cricket. I have a vision for Rajasthan Cricket Association both for infrastructure development as well as cricketing activities in the state which I would accomplish with the full support of the association. 

With regard to the pending issues with BCCI the statement said that since the people holding responsible positions in BCCI are sensitive to the needs of cricket and young cricketers we look forward to an amicable resolution of all issues.

 

ON CHRIS CAIRNS ISSUE

I am aware of the verdict at Southwark Crown Court. As you know I am limited in what I can say as I am restricted by the injunction put in place following the 2012 libel trial. I will consider how this affects my own civil claim against Mr Cairns in due course.

 

 

 

FOR THE MISINFORMED MEDIA 

OPINION OF HON'BLE MR  JUSTICE SINHA (RETRD)

STATUS ON 16 SHOW CAUSE NOTICES : ALL COMPLETELY REPLIED

 

 

1. SHOW CAUSE NOTICE ON INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT GROUP (IMG) ISSUE

2. 11 SHOW CAUSE NOTICES ON SOUTH AFRICA ISSUE

3. SHOW CAUSE NOTICE ON PLAYERS ISSUE

42 SHOW CAUSE NOTICES ON PERFORMANCE DEPOSIT ISSUE

5. SHOW CAUSE NOTICE ON SONY ISSUE

Note:

1. In 2010, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) started various investigations pertaining to BCCI- IPL. After investigations, the ED issued 16 show cause notices (SCN) on merit - 1 show cause notice on IMG contract issue, 11 SCN on conduct of IPL 2 in South Africa, 1 show cause notice on giving of guarantees to foreign players, 2 SCN on acceptance of performance deposit from foreign bidders, and 1 show cause notice on IPL Media Rights issue.

2. Mr. Lalit Kumar Modi has filed his reply on merits to each of the SCN issued by the ED.

3. On merits, in none of the SCN issued by the ED, any personal misdemeanor of Mr. Lalit Modi was found. Rather, Mr. Modi has been arrayed as a co-noticee with the aid of Section 42 of FEMA, which provides for vicarious liability merely because he was Chairman of IPL . 

4. In those investigations, it was apparent that  Mr. Modi had no financial powers or cheque signing powers,  which vested with the Secretary and Treasurer of BCCI, and  had no role to play in any outward remittance. Consequently, no foreign exchange violation has been done by Mr. Modi.

5.    In effect, the ED has found that the responsibility in BCCI was collective rather than individual and the allegation made by BCCI that Mr Modi was acting without authority was not true and in effect discarded by the ED.

6.    The copy of  show cause notices on IMG issue, SA issue, players issue, performance deposit issue, and Sony issue are annexed as Annexure 1 to 5 respectively. The copies of replies of Mr. Modi to these notices are annexed as Annexure 6 to 10 respectively.

7.    The  brief tabular form of the various SCN issued by the ED are set out as under:

Sr. No.

Complaint upon which the show cause notice was based 

Show cause notice

Role of Mr. Modi 

Whether response filed

Status 

1.    

A complaint was filed on 13.7.2011 alleging that BCCI had hired IMG, an international sports marketing agency as consultant for IPL and this was done without approval of RBI.

Based on this complaint, 1 showcause notice dated 20.7.2011 was issued to BCCI, Mr. N. Srinivasan, the Secretary BCCI, Mr. MP Pandove, Treasurer BCCI, and Mr. Modi. 

Mr. Modi has been issued notice only under Section 42 (1) of FEMA, which provides for vicarious liability.

The BCCI has filed a detailed response to the show cause notice denying  the allegations made therein. Mr. Modi has separately filed a reply denying the allegations and that Section 42 (1) does not apply to him. 

Pending adjudication 

2.    

A complaint was filed on 17.11.2011 alleging that BCCI held the 2ndseason of IPL in South Africa and this was done without approval of RBI.

11 SCN dated 25.11.2011 were issued against the BCCI on a single complaint pertaining to each forex transaction in South Africa. Mr. Shashank Manohar, the President BCCI, Mr. N. Srinivasan, the Secy. BCCI, Mr. M.P. Pandove, the Treasurer, Mr. Ratnakar Shetty, CEO, BCCI, Mr. Prassanna Kanan, the Manager, Business and Commercial Services, IPL, Mr. Sunder Raman, COO, IPL and  Mr. Modi are co-noticees.

The notice has been issued to Mr. Modi under Section 42 (1) of FEMA providing for vicarious liability.

The BCCI has filed a detailed response to the show cause notice denying  the allegations made therein. Mr. Modi has separately filed a reply stating that he had no role at all to play in the forex transactions and that Section 42 (1) does not apply to him.

Pending adjudication 

3.    

A complaint was filed on 16.2.2012 alleging that BCCI gave guarantees to foreign players participating in IPL without permission of RBI.

1 show cause notice was issued on 21.2.2012 to the BCCI, Mr. Niranjan Shah, the then Secretary, and Mr. Modi.

The notice has been issued to  Mr. Modi under Section 42 (1) of FEMA providing for vicarious liability

The BCCI has filed a detailed response to the show cause notice denying  the allegations made therein. Mr. Modi has separately filed a reply denying the allegations and that Section 42 (1) does not apply to him.

Pending adjudication 

4.    

A complaint dated 22.8.2012 was filed that BCCI while awarding contracts to foreign bidders accepted performance deposit/earnest money in foreign currency without seeking RBI approval. 

On 23.8.2012, SCN were issued to the BCCI, Mr. N. Srinivasan, Mr. Niranjan Shah, and Mr. Modi. 

The notice has been issued to Mr. Modi under Section 42 (1) of FEMA providing for vicarious liability.

Mr. Modi has filed a reply denying the allegations and that Section 42 (1) does not apply to him.

Pending adjudication

5.    

A complaint dated 19.1.2015 was filed that BCCI while awarding contract to Sony had guaranteed payment of fees to WSG. 

On 11.2.2015, show cause notice was issued to the BCCI, Mr. N. Srinivasan, Mr. Sundar Raman, and Mr. Modi as well as WSG and Sony and their directors.

The notice has been issued to Mr. Modi under Section 42 of FEMA providing for vicarious liability.

Mr. Modi has filed a reply denying the allegations and that Section 42 does not apply to him.

Pending adjudication

 

WATCH LALIT MODI'S INTERVIEW WITH RAJDEEP SARDESAI  

 READ: MODI'S OPEN LETTER TO THE MEDIA

READ: LALIT MODI INTERVIEW IN THE OPEN MAGAZINE

QUIZ: HOW WELL DO YOU KNOW LALIT MODI?

BUZZFEED: LALIT MODI'S ACHIEVEMENTS

MEET N SRINIVASAN: THE MOST CORRUPT BCCI PRESIDENT EVER

 

 

Follow my thoughts on the BCCI crisis through my Twitter account @lalitkmodi
‘Disqualified’ Shukla attends IPL auction
Lodha Panel says he stood disqualified, having already served nine years with the UPCA.
BCCI's legal counsel sacked
The COA's first job will be to conduct elections in all state cricket associations along with implementation of the reforms.