25 May 2017 last updated at 10:45 GMT
 
Lodha committee slams door shut on cricket bosses
Thursday 12 January 2017

Lodha committee slams door shut on cricket bosses
The Lodha committee has cleared the ambiguities, closed the loopholes and bolted the backdoor entry of the ousted/disqualified BCCI and state associations office-bearers’ into Indian cricket administration. 
The Supreme Court-appointed committee’s latest set of directives, issued through FAQs, debar the likes of Anurag Thakur and Ajay Shirke to return to the BCCI even as a nominee of their respective state units. But not only the erstwhile BCCI president and secretary, the committee, in fact, has sent almost the whole gamut of the BCCI, and state associations, into cricket administrative retirement.
The FAQs have been uploaded on the Lodha committee website on Thursday upon receiving various queries from different parts of the country. The directives clears the ambiguities over the nine-year cumulative clause, saying it would be applicable concurrently to the BCCI and state units. 
If someone has completed nine years in a state association as an office-bearer, he/she won’t be eligible for an office-bearer post in the BCCI as well and vice-versa. It clarifies that Sourav Ganguly will have to go for a three-year cooling off period after June this year, virtually ruling him out as the next BCCI president. It also explains why Shirke and the other removed/disqualified officials cannot return to the BCCI as nominees of their respective state associations.
The Supreme Court in its January 2 order had removed Thakur and Shirke from their posts of BCCI president and secretary respectively for noncompliance. The nine-year cumulative clause in the committee recommendations, accepted by the apex court, made them, and also every other BCCI official, ineligible to hold office in their respective state associations as well. 
Accordingly, the managing committee of the Maharashtra Cricket Association (MCA) nominated a new panel of office-bearers with Abhay Apte as the president. But during the meeting, a resolution was passed that Shirke would continue to represent the MCA in the BCCI in all meetings. Shirke now stands disqualified in that capacity as well.
“A disqualified office bearer is no longer to be associated with cricket administration. He/she is disqualified from being a representative or nominee of the member association or the BCCI and cannot discharge any other role in or on behalf of the association or the BCCI. He/she cannot function within the association in any patron or advisory capacity nor be a member of a committee or council,” the committee said.
It means Shirke has now been relegated to a general member of the MCA. So is Thakur in the Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association, Anirudh Chaudhry in Haryana, Amitabh Choudhary in Jharkhand and the list goes on.
Even after the Supreme Court’s amended January 3 order, confusion prevailed in Indian cricket administration about the nine-year cumulative period, because the Lodha committee, in its original report, had mentioned the nine-year disqualification clause would apply separately to the BCCI and state associations. The panel has now altered it as per the court directive. 
“In view of the order dated 2.1.2017 as amended by the order dated 3.1.2017, an individual is disqualified from being the office bearer of the BCCI or the state/member association if he/she has been an office bearer of the BCCI or the state/member association for 9 years,” it said.

The Lodha committee has cleared the ambiguities, closed the loopholes and bolted the backdoor entry of the ousted/disqualified BCCI and state associations office-bearers’ into Indian cricket administration. 

The Supreme Court-appointed committee’s latest set of directives, issued through FAQs, debar the likes of Anurag Thakur and Ajay Shirke to return to the BCCI even as a nominee of their respective state units. But not only the erstwhile BCCI president and secretary, the committee, in fact, has sent almost the whole gamut of the BCCI, and state associations, into cricket administrative retirement.

The FAQs have been uploaded on the Lodha committee website on Thursday upon receiving various queries from different parts of the country. The directives clears the ambiguities over the nine-year cumulative clause, saying it would be applicable concurrently to the BCCI and state units. 

If someone has completed nine years in a state association as an office-bearer, he/she won’t be eligible for an office-bearer post in the BCCI as well and vice-versa. It clarifies that Sourav Ganguly will have to go for a three-year cooling off period after June this year, virtually ruling him out as the next BCCI president. It also explains why Shirke and the other removed/disqualified officials cannot return to the BCCI as nominees of their respective state associations.

The Supreme Court in its January 2 order had removed Thakur and Shirke from their posts of BCCI president and secretary respectively for noncompliance. The nine-year cumulative clause in the committee recommendations, accepted by the apex court, made them, and also every other BCCI official, ineligible to hold office in their respective state associations as well. 

Accordingly, the managing committee of the Maharashtra Cricket Association (MCA) nominated a new panel of office-bearers with Abhay Apte as the president. But during the meeting, a resolution was passed that Shirke would continue to represent the MCA in the BCCI in all meetings. Shirke now stands disqualified in that capacity as well.

“A disqualified office bearer is no longer to be associated with cricket administration. He/she is disqualified from being a representative or nominee of the member association or the BCCI and cannot discharge any other role in or on behalf of the association or the BCCI. He/she cannot function within the association in any patron or advisory capacity nor be a member of a committee or council,” the committee said.

It means Shirke has now been relegated to a general member of the MCA. So is Thakur in the Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association, Anirudh Chaudhry in Haryana, Amitabh Choudhary in Jharkhand and the list goes on.

Even after the Supreme Court’s amended January 3 order, confusion prevailed in Indian cricket administration about the nine-year cumulative period, because the Lodha committee, in its original report, had mentioned the nine-year disqualification clause would apply separately to the BCCI and state associations. The panel has now altered it as per the court directive. 

“In view of the order dated 2.1.2017 as amended by the order dated 3.1.2017, an individual is disqualified from being the office bearer of the BCCI or the state/member association if he/she has been an office bearer of the BCCI or the state/member association for 9 years,” it said.

BCCI invites applications for India coach role
The board has invited interested candidates to apply for the job on or before May 31, Kumble gets a direct entry.
Uncertainty around 'new cricket world'
Cricket's pay fight intensifies as players establish intellectual property company