18 April 2017 last updated at 06:09 GMT
 
Setback for BCCI as SC turns down petition
Friday 11 April 2014

The Board of Control for Cricket in India suffered a setback today when the Supreme Court turned down a petition to hand over audio recording of statements made by Chennai Super Kings skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni, CSK owner N. Srinivasan and IPL COO Sundar Raman to its lawyers. They had deposed before the court-appointed inquiry committee, headed by retired judge Justice Mukul Mudgal.

The two-judge bench of Justice A.K. Patnaik and Justice J.S. Khehar told the BCCI lawyers on Friday that they will examine if handing over the transcripts is required when the IPL scam case comes up for hearing again on April 16.

Earlier on Wednesday, BCCI had filed a petition in the Supreme Court seeking examination of the deposition of Dhoni, Srinivasan and Sundar Raman before the Mudgal committee that was appointed to probe last year's IPL corruption scandal.

The Mudgal committee, appointed in October 2013, had investigated the IPL scandal for four months before submitting its reports to the two-judge Supreme Court bench on February 10.

Along with two reports, the panel also submitted a sealed envelope that contained "many allegations of sporting fraud". Several reports have circulated in the media that links India skipper Dhoni with bookies.

The BCCI's lawyers sought transcripts of the deposition saying they wanted to argue their case better on April 16. A final order from the court is expected after the next hearing.

The petitioner's counsel has already charged Dhoni for not revealing the real identity of Srinivasan’s son-in-law Gurunath Meiyappan.  Gurunath has been indicted by the panel for betting and sharing team information. Dhoni reportedly said Meiyappan was "an enthusiast". The Mudgal committee, in its report, confirmed Meiyappan was a team official.

Supreme Court has already passed an interim order on March 28. It has stripped Srinivasan of his powers as BCCI president and appointed two interim Board heads -- Sunil Gavaskar (for IPL affairs) and Shivlal Yadav (for non-IPL affairs).

The court also wants Gavaskar to take action against Sundar Raman, whose name has also been linked to betting. Sundar Raman has run the IPL ever since it started in 2008.

SC to hear CAB plea
The Bengal association seeks to challenge CoA
Srinivasan cannot represent BCCI: SC
Supreme Court also allows BCCI CEO Rahul Johri to accompany Chaudhary